Showing posts with label christ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label christ. Show all posts

Friday, 28 December 2018

Without Me, You Can Do Nothing

If you’re Sick- He is the great Physician
If you’re Poor - He is your Riches
If you’re Weak - He is your Strength
If you’re in Trouble - He is your Deliverer
If you’re Fearful - He is your Peace
Without Him we are Helpless, Hopeless, and Powerless 



Whatever God call us to do ...He will give us the ability and tools to do it! 
If you don’t have the ability..  He’ll give it to you 
If you don’t have the resources.. He’ll provide them for you 
"My God shall provide all my needs according to his riches in glory by Jesus." Phil. 4:19 
We all put limitations on ourselves and upon God when we say, “I can’t do that because- 
I don’t have the education...
I’m not smart enough..
I don’t have enough money...
I’m too young...
I’m too old... 
Our problem is we put limitations on ourselves and God!  Just as Paul said in Romans, Chapter 1, we worship God – not as God – but as a man, as a human being like ourselves: 
“Because that when they knew God, they glorified Him not as God,. Neither were thankful; but became vain (futile) in their thoughts, and their foolish heart was darkened.
“Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 
“And changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like corruptible man. . . Romans 1:21-23 
If we can’t do it – we don’t believe God can do it either. 
God has promised to “heal ALL our diseases” (Psalm 103:3) ‘IF we follow His laws, His commandments, and His decrees.”  Deut 7:11-15

God promises to “heal ALL our diseases” but only if we do it His way, which includes learning to know Him so well that we are willing to “believe” that what He has promised – He WILL do.  And we must act on our beliefs by following His Health Plan with 100% commitment. 


Atheists can reject God, blaspheme God, curse God, and deny that God exists.  But they can’t do any of these things - - without God.  The only place they get the life and breath to reject, blaspheme, curse, and deny the existence of God - - - - is from God! 
They just end up looking downright silly.  That’s why the Bible says,
“The fool has said in his heart, There is no God.” Psalm 53:1
God runs everything in our life.  He has planned every day of the life of each of us before He created the earth.  He is the vine; we are the branches.  Without an attachment to Him, we would be unable to do anything, including living and breathing. 
“Look to Me and be saved (healed – sozo). . .” Isaiah 45:22  
“I am the vine, you are the branches: He that abideth in Me and I in him, the same bringeth forth much fruit: for without Me, you can do nothing.”  John 15:5  
“I can do anything through Christ which strengthens me.” Phil 4:13 
In all your ways acknowledge Him and HE will direct your paths.” Prov 3:6  
“God is operating ALL according to the counsel of His own will.”  Eph 1:11  
“In Him we live, and move and are (have our being).” Acts 17:28  
“Christ in you – the expectation (not “hope”) of glory.” Col 1:27  
“Be anxious for nothing.” Phil 4:6 
“Without God - - - no one can do anything.


Thursday, 27 December 2018

[RO/EN] Veniti! - este motto-ul evangheliei / Come and Welcome

[RO] Din prima clipa a vieții spirituale până ce ajungi în glorie, chemarea lui Hristos este: „Veniți, veniți la Mine!”
El va merge întotdeauna înaintea ta, rugându-te să-L urmezi așa cum soldatul își urmează conducătorul. El va merge întotdeauna înaintea ta pentru a-ți pava drumul și a-ți pregăti calea și te va ruga să-L urmezi pe tot parcursul vieții tale. Şi în clipa solemna a morții, când vei zăcea în pat în dureri, cuvântul Lui dulce cu care te va introduce în lumea cerească va fi același: Vino, vino la Mine! Întinde-ți aripile și zboară spre această lume de bucurii unde locuiesc Eu. Vino pentru a fi cu Mine, unde sunt Eu.”
Dar aceasta nu este numai chemarea pe care Hristos ți-o adresează ție, ci, dacă ești credincios, este și chemarea pe care tu I-o adresezi lui Hristos: „Vino, vino!” Vei aștepta cu dor cea de-a doua venire a Lui și vei spune: „Vino repede, da, vino, Doamne Isuse!”
Şi întotdeauna vei dori o comuniune cât mai apropiată cu El. După cum El te cheamă, „Vino,” tot așa va fi și rugăciunea ta către El: „Vino, Doamne, și locuiește în casa mea! Vino și consacrează-mă mai deplin în slujba Ta; vino și ocupă numai Tu singur tronul inimii mele.”

[EN]  "Come," then, is the very motto-word of the gospel.
From the first moment of your spiritual life until you are ushered into glory, the cry of Christ to you will be, "Come, come unto me." 
He will always be ahead of you, bidding you follow him as the soldier follows his leader. He will always go before you to pave your way, and to prepare your path, and he will bid you come after him all through life, and in the solemn hour of death, when you shall lie panting upon your bed, his sweet word with which he shall usher you into the heavenly world shall be-"Come, come unto me. Stretch thy wings and fly straight to this world of joy where I am dwelling. Come and be with me where I am."
Nay, further than this, this is not only Christ's cry to you; but if you be a believer, this is your cry to Christ-"Come! come!" You will be longing for his second advent; you will be saying, "Come quickly, even so come Lord Jesus." 

And you will be always panting for nearer and closer communion with him. As his voice to you is "Come," even so will be your prayer to him, "Come, Lord, and abide in my house. Come, and consecrate me more fully to thy service; come, and without a rival reign; come, occupy alone the throne of my heart."
"Come," then, is the very motto-word of the gospel

C.H. Spurgeon

Sunday, 16 September 2018

Paradoxuri

Paradoxuri Credinciosul vede lucruri care nu se văd deloc Și câștigă-ntotdeauna când renunță la: ”Eu pot!” Stăpânește multe lucruri, bogății imense are, Neavând nimic aici, prețios sau de valoare. Înălțat creștinul este doar atunci când e smerit, Iar odihnă el primește doar sub jug divin primit. Liber este când e rob Legii Duhului de viață, Și trăiește când e mort, iar din rău mereu învață. El domnește când slujește și ajunge înțelept, Când nebun e pentru lume și-are raiu-n al lui piept. Viața el de și-o urăște, o câștigă pentru cer, Biruiește-atunci când pierde din ego-ul său de fier. Cinstea lui este rușinea, când mereu batjocorit; O comoară își adună în tărâmul mult dorit. Nu se laudă, având putere, ci cu multe slăbiciuni Și devine tot mai tare când e slab – e pus pe culmi. Strălucește când renunță la lumină – faima lui, Și când pofta și dorința credincios le pune-n cui. Repede, frumos el crește și e tot mai credincios, Când domol cu Domnul merge sau pe bancă de stau jos. Minunată este viața de creștin și bucuros; Credinciosul înțelege planul sfânt și glorios! Tot ce pare că-i ciudat, imposibil sau pe dos Este logic și posibil doar când ești al lui Cristos! Autor: Oana Vidican

Saturday, 11 April 2015

The Passion of the Christ / Patimile lui Isus

The film covers primarily the final 12 hours of Jesus' life, beginning with the Agony in the Garden of Gethsemane, the insomnia and grievance of the Virgin Mary, but ending with a brief depiction of his resurrection.
 Flashbacks of Jesus as a child and as a young man with Mary his mother, giving the Sermon on the Mount, teaching the Twelve Apostles, and at the Last Supper are some of the images depicted. The dialogue is entirely in reconstructed Aramaic and Latin with vernacular subtitles.
Worth watching!



Filmul începe cu scena din Grădina Ghetsimani unde Iisus se roagă și este ispitit de Satana, în timp ce apostolii săi Petru, Iacov și Ioan dorm. După ce a primit treizeci de arginți, unul dintre apostolii lui Iisus, Iuda, se apropie însoțit de gardienii templului și-l trădează pe Iisus cu un sărut pe obraz. În timp ce gardienii se mișcă pentru a-l aresta pe Iisus, Petru taie urechea lui Malchus, dar Isus o pune la loc și o vindecă. Apoi apostolii fug, iar gardienii templului îl arestează pe Iisus și îl bat tot timpul în drumul lor către Sinedriu. Ioan îi spune Mariei și Mariei Magdalena despre arestarea lui Iisus, în timp ce Petru îl urmărește pe Iisus de la distanță. Caiafa începe un proces trecând cu vederea peste obiecțiilor celorlalți preoți, care sunt expulzați din sala de judecată. Când este întrebat de către Caiafa dacă el este fiul lui Dumnezeu, Iisus îi răspunde : "Eu sunt" . Caiafa este îngrozit și rupe hainele iar Iisus este condamnat la moarte pentru blasfemie. Petru, care urmărea totul pe ascuns, este recunoscut de trei ori dar neagă că îl cunoaște pe Isus, dar apoi fuge plângând după ce își amintește că Iisus a prezis acest lucru. Între timp, Iuda are remușcări și încearcă să returneze banii pentru ca Iisus să fie eliberat, dar este refuzat de către preoți. Chinuit de demoni, el fuge din oraș și se spânzură cu o frânghie pe care o găsește asupra unui măgar mort.
Caiafa îl duce pe Isus înaintea lui Pilat din Pont pentru a fi condamnat la moarte. Însă, după interogatoriu, Pilat nu găsește nicio vină asupra lui Iisus. Aflând că este din Nazaret, Pilat îl trimite atunci la curtea lui Irod Antipa, deoarece ținea de jurisdicția acestuia. După ce Isus este din nou găsit nevinovat și trimis înapoi la Pilat, prefectul roman spune mulțimii că îl va pedepsi pe Isus și apoi îl va elibera. Apoi Pilat are o ultima încercarea de a-l elibera pe Iisus, punând oamenii să aleagă între a-l elibera pe acesta sau pe criminalul Baraba. Spre uimirea sa, mulțimea dorește ca Baraba să fie eliberat și Iisus ucis. Într-un efort de a liniști mulțimea, Pilat comandă ca Iisus să fie brutal biciuit și batjocorit cu o coroană de spini pe cap. Cu toate acestea, mulțimea continuă să ceară ca Iisus să fie răstignit și ca lui Baraba să i se dea drumul. Pilat se spală pe mâini de această faptă și fără tragere de inimă ordona crucificarea lui Iisus.
Iisus își poartă crucea pe umeri de-a lungul Via Dolorosa către Golgota. Pe drum, Veronica șterge fața lui Iisus cu mahrama sa. Simon din Cirene este obligat fără voia lui să care crucea alături de Iisus. Apoi Iisus este răstignit. În timp ce atârnă pe cruce, Iisus se roagă pentru iertarea celor care au făcut acest lucru și mânuiește un criminal crucificat alături de el. După ce Iisus își dă sufletul și moare, o singură picătură de ploaie cade din cer, provocând un cutremur care distruge Templul și rupe în două pânza care acoperea Sfânta Sfintelor, spre groaza lui Caiafa și a celorlalți preoți. Este prezentat apoi Satan țipând disperat pentru înfrângerea sa. Iisus este dat jos de pe cruce. În final, Iisus se ridica din morți și iese din mormânt.

Thursday, 12 May 2011

WHAT THE WORLD NEEDS MOST

When we celebrate the gospel of Christ and the love of God, and when we lift up the gift of salvation, let us do it in such a way that people will see through it to God himself. May those who hear the gospel from our lips know that salvation is the blood-bought gift of seeing and savoring the glory of Christ. May they believe and say, “Christ is all!” Or, to use the words of the psalmist, “May those who love your salvation say evermore, ‘God is great!’” (Ps. 70:4). Not mainly, “Salvation is great,” but “God is great!”

 May the church of Jesus Christ say with increasing intensity, “The LORD is my chosen portion and my cup” (Ps. 16:5). “As a deer pants for flowing streams, so pants my soul for you, O God. My soul thirsts for God, for the living God” (Ps. 42:1). “We would rather be away from the body and at home with the Lord” (2 Cor.5:8). “My desire is to depart and be with Christ, for that is far bet-ter” (Phil. 1:23). The world needs nothing more than to see the worth of Christ in the work and words of his God-besotted people. This will come to pass when the church awakens to the truth that the saving love of God is the gift of himself, and that God himself is the gospel.

God is the Gospel - J. Piper



Thursday, 10 June 2010

Christ in Us, Our Hope of Glory

To them God willed to make known what are the riches of the glory of this mystery among the Gentiles: which is Christ in you, the hope of glory.  (Col_1:27)

We have been considering the wondrous truth that we who believe in Jesus are in Christ. "Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, who has blessed us with every spiritual blessing in the heavenly places in Christ" (Eph_1:3). All that God has for us is ours "in Christ." We can now enjoy the benefits of who Christ is and all that He has accomplished for us, because we are in Him. Our present verse adds another extraordinary dimension. Not only are we "in Christ," but Christ is also in us: "Christ in you, the hope of glory."
God wants to make something known among all the nations: "to make known... among the Gentiles." The message He desires to reveal is glorious in spiritual richness: "the riches of the glory of this mystery." However, it truly is a mystery, in the New Testament use of that term. A biblical mystery is something that can only be known by the revealing work of God. The mysteries of the scriptures cannot be discovered or understood by intellectual investigation or personal experience. God Himself must make them known. The Lord does this through the grace-empowered, Spirit-empowered proclamation of His word. Here, the great mystery God wants to unfold is "Christ in you, the hope of glory."

What a grand hope this message brings! Jesus, the Son of God, is willing to come and dwell within us to assure us of making it to glory (heaven) some day. Meanwhile, Christ wants to reside at the very core of our being: "that Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith" (Eph_3:17). As we are trusting in Him, He is living in, and working through, our hearts. Then, from this strategic point of intimacy and access, He gives us heavenly hope. That confident expectation includes the joyous fact that He is coming again: "looking for the blessed hope and glorious appearing of our great God and Savior Jesus Christ" (Tit_2:13). Yet, His return is not our only hope. He, Himself, is our day by day hope: "Paul, an apostle of Jesus Christ, by the commandment of God our Savior and the Lord Jesus Christ, our hope" (1Ti_1:1). Jesus is our comprehensive hope!

Lord Jesus, my hope, I praise You for the hope You give — anticipation of Your return, assurance of heaven, and daily confidence in Your working in me. Forgive me, Lord, for the times I place my hope and confidence elsewhere. Teach me, help me to put my hope in You alone, in Your faithful name I pray, Amen.


Bob Hoekstra

Monday, 1 February 2010

Cautam o biserica ?

„Ce căutăm, ce dorim noi în acest sens?
Să facem o cernere a lucrurilor esențiale dintre cele generale.
Căutăm o biserică națională, romană, anglicană, grecească, olandeză (reformată), etc? Căutăm o biserică denominațională, metodistă, baptistă, episcopală, luterană, presbiteriană, independentă, etc? Căutăm o biserică ”liberă” sau ”de stat”, nedenominațională, interdenominațională? Căutăm o biserică ”deschisă” sau ”exclusivistă”? Căutăm o biserică cu anumite caracteristici particulare, moduri de practică, formă și comportament? Căutăm ”o biserică nou-testamentală” sau biserici cu anumite lucruri luate din Noul Testament care o constituie? Căutăm o catedrală sau o clădire simplă, mare sau mică? Are biserica căutată de noi un interior anume: fie el simplu, modest sau împodobit? Își îndreaptă Dumnezeu privirea din ”Locașul Ceresc” spre astfel de lucruri, le caută El? Dorește El așa ceva? Îl interesează aceste lucruri câtuși de puțin? Este El impresionat de podoabe și ornamente; de pompa și procesiunea desfășurării? Îl impresionează pe Atotputernicul îmbrăcămintea și veșmintele noastre preoțești și sacerdotale, robele, vestaliile, sutanele și turbanele? Privește El la toate acestea cu admirație și uimire? Le acordă atenție sau pur și simplu le ignoră? Și dacă totuși privește la ele nu o face oare plin de compătimire, poate chiar distrându-Se de ce vede? Bietele ființe omenești care se joacă de-a biserica și de-a serviciile religioase asemenea copiilor din vremea lui Isus care jucau în piețe pentru nunți și înmormîntări! Este vreun lucru din toate acestea sau toate laolaltă care să atragă privirea ”Celui care șade în cer”? (Psalm 2:4).”
„ Dumnezeu și Cerul nu sunt interesați de acel lucru care poartă numele de Biserică și nici bisericile locale ca atare. Dumnezeu și Cerul sunt interesați de Cristos, de natura Sa, natură cerească: în Duh și-n adevăr, în viață veșnică, în purtare și comportament ; în valori și caracter, în autoritate și luptă; în biruință asupra păcatului, asupra lui Satan și asupra lumii. Fără-ndoială, nu este vorba de o așezare în termeni geografici, ci ”oriunde doi sau trei sunt adunați laolaltă în Numele Meu, acolo sunt și Eu.” Asta se poate întâmpla pe vapor sau în avion și nici una, nici cealaltă nu sunt așezări fixe. Cristos poate să fie în Efes sau Laodicea sau în orice alt loc, dar Cel care definește Biserica este Cristos, nu locul! Cristos poate să Se afle într-o adunare, într-un clădire, într-o denominațiune cu toate astea cei de-acolo, luați ca întreg, să nu se afle în Cristos. Noi pe El Îl căutăm. Când ne strângem, la El ne strângem. EL este Terenul; ne adunăm pe El.Față de o bună parte din ”creștinism” și din”creștinătate” trebuie să ne-nchidem ochii deliberat, să ”nu le cunoaștem potrivit cărnii”, preocuparea noastră fiind Cristosul din oameni. ”Părtășia noastră este cu Tatăl și cu Fiul Său”. Dacă nu-L putem găsi în oameni, atunci acolo nu există părtășie cerească.”
„”Temelia Bisericii” trebuie să fie Cristos, doar Cristos; El trebuie să hotărască toate lucrurile și să fie răspunsul tuturor problemelor ”bisericii” noastre. Să ne grăbim să adăugăm că această scrisoare ne arată cât de valoroasă este exprimarea corporativă a lui Cristos oriunde ar fi ea. Aceste valori (strângerile laolaltă) sunt pentru credincios și lumea din jurul său. Asemenea strângeri sunt legate de prezența lui Cristos ca Trup, ca protecție și acoperire, ca zidire și maturitate; ca înrădăcinare și temeinicie; ca putere spirituală și ascendență; ca funcționare reciprocă și slujire; ca mărturie și impact asupra teritoriilor satanice și modului de gândire al îngerilor. În această scrisoare, toate astea se raportează la o adevărată expresie a lui Cristos. Dacă întrebăm: ”Poate să existe o asemenea expresie?” răspunsul nostru este: ”Da, chiar dacă nu este perfectă și desăvârșită, poate să existe într-o măsură vitală”.



Sursa: T.Austin Sparks, Misiunea, scopul şi mesajul lui Cristos în scrisoarea către Efeseni.

Sunday, 13 December 2009

Correction (Jeremiah 29:10-14)

When God’s redeeming work in your life is complete, you will love God with all your heart and you will love your neighbor as yourself. You will reflect God’s glory along with a vast community of redeemed people drawn from every nation in whom His image has been fully restored.

God receives us in our sin, but he never leaves us in our sins. He is relentless in calling us to follow His ways and in correcting us when we depart from them.

After the time of David, there followed a line of kings, some good, but mostly bad. God’s people worshipped other gods, and walked in their ways. God sent prophets who spoke His Word, calling the people to repentance and obedience. Their message was largely ignored, and so God, whose Word never fails, moved to discipline and correct His people.

The land God had given to His people was over-run by their enemies, and God’s people became exiles in Babylon, where they lived under the discipline of God, and wept their way through 70 years of sorrow.

God never abandons His promise, and even in this severe trial, He was advancing His ultimate purpose for His people. God’s plans for His people are always good. He may hurt us but he will never harm us. His wounds are the wounds of a friend, who will not let you go.

Christ came into the world to save his people from their sins (Matthew 1:21). That means more than forgiveness. Salvation is deliverance from sin and all its effects. It means washing sin’s guilt, breaking sin’s power, healing sin’s pain, removing sin’s regret, and finally expelling sin’s presence.

Hope is sustained for the Christian by looking ahead to your joy that will be full when Christ’s saving work is complete. On that day, your sins will not only be covered, they will be gone. Your sorrow over your own sins, and your pain over the sins of others will be erased as God wipes all tears from your eyes.

Sin will be no more — no longer in you, and nowhere to be seen around you. So take heart and be encouraged in your struggle with sin and sorrow today. It will not always be so. In this life, we are sinners even at our best, but we are sinners in whom God is at work by His Spirit restoring the reflection of His image. When you see Christ, you will be like Him. Having this hope, walk in purity today (1 John 3:2, 3).



Colin Smith, Senior Pastor of The Orchard Evangelical Free Church

thegospelcoalition.org

Monday, 7 December 2009

Christianity [Britannica Student Article]

Introduction

On a late afternoon, in about the year AD 30, two men were walking from Jerusalem to the nearby village of Emmaus. Their conversation centered on notable events that had occurred the previous week. As they journeyed, they were joined by a stranger who seemed ignorant of these events. Surprised, they asked him: “Are you the only person staying in Jerusalem not to know what has happened there in the last few days?” So they explained to him about a certain Jesus of Nazareth, “a prophet powerful in speech and action before God and the whole people. Our chief priests and rulers handed him over [to the Roman authorities] to be sentenced to death, and [they] crucified him. But we were hoping that he was the man to liberate Israel.” Even more amazing, they went on to say, were reports from some women who visited his tomb that he was alive again, raised from the dead.

Suddenly the stranger spoke: “How dull-witted you two are! And how slow to believe all that the prophets said. Was not the messiah bound to suffer thus before entering upon his glory?” Then he went on to clarify from the Hebrew scriptures all the passages that referred to himself. For the stranger was Jesus of Nazareth, of whom the two had been speaking.

Based on the life, death, and coming to life again of this man Jesus—also called the Christ—there has developed the world's largest religion, Christianity. It claims more than one billion members in all parts of the world. In the late 20th century, it is divided into hundreds of groups, or denominations, the largest of which are the Roman Catholic church, the Eastern Orthodox churches, and innumerable Protestant churches.

Expectation and Reality

The two men on the road to Emmaus were not disinterested bystanders. They were followers (called disciples, or learners) of Jesus who had known him for at least three years. During this period they had listened to all he said and had witnessed his amazing actions, such as healing the sick, giving sight to the blind and hearing to the deaf, and even bringing individuals back to life. They had become convinced that he was “the one who was to redeem Israel.”

Israel wanted and expected redemption. This small Jewish nation, located in the eastern part of the Roman Empire, had for centuries looked forward to a time when their God would, through some decisive action, free it from outside domination and establish it as the preeminent nation in the world. One way he might do this was by sending a messiah (Christos in Greek) who would deliver them from their enemies and become their king. The word messiah means “the lord's anointed,” someone God has set aside for a specific task.

Christians believe that Jesus, from the small town of Nazareth in Galilee, was that messiah. They also believe that what he accomplished far exceeded the expectations of Israel. The Jews looked for a messiah exclusively for themselves, though his power would be such as to draw other nations to a belief in their God. Christians believe that Jesus, as God's agent, accomplished something that was intended to benefit the whole world directly without being tied to the fate of any single nation. His work is to be considered inclusive of everyone in all times and places.

The Man and the Message

With all the differences in beliefs in the many denominations of Christianity, it is impossible to set out one list of teachings that apply to all Christians everywhere. The reason for this is fairly simple. Jesus, along with his life and work, are for Christians objects of faith; and the objects of faith are thought of by different people in different ways and differently in various periods of history. No one has ever succeeded in distilling an “essence of Christianity.” But the early followers of Jesus came the closest in their assertion that “Jesus is lord.” By this they seemed to mean that he was more than a man. He was also, in some incomprehensible way, God. And by his ministry, death, and resurrection he had accomplished a universal salvation available to all who believe in him.

What Jesus said and did can be gleaned from the first four books of the Bible's New Testament . These books—Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John—are not biographies; they are called Gospels, a word that means “good news,” because they are his followers' written testimonies of what his life was all about.

The Gospels depict a man who was thoroughly imbued with the whole tradition of Israel's religion from the time of Abraham onward.

From what Jesus said and did, his followers came to believe that God was perhaps acting through him in a very special way. Very possibly he was the one long awaited who would inaugurate God's kingdom on Earth. It was reasonable that they should think this, for they too were Israelites; and they saw in his words and deeds what portended to be the dawning of a new age. What dashed their hopes was his ignoble death, for crucifixion was a punishment reserved for criminals. Then came the great surprise: He was raised from the dead and appeared to them again over a period of 40 days. This stunning event required a complete reassessment of what Jesus was all about.

It is this reassessment that forms the basis for the writings of the New Testament. The Gospels themselves are part of it, but it is more strikingly conveyed by the other 23 books, all written by his followers over the subsequent decades after he had left them.

For he had left them. How and where to could only be explained as his returning to the God who had sent him. But he did not leave them forever: He promised that he would one day return, and he gave them a mission to perform—to carry the message about his life and work to the whole world.

The Assembly of Believers: the Church

First, a word about terminology. The small group of Jesus' followers that gathered in Jerusalem after his departure did not call themselves anything. The word Christian came into use years later and was at first a derogatory term applied by outsiders. When the books of the New Testament were written, the word used to name the believers was simply assembly. The Greek word is ecclesia and denotes any assembly of people, though it often had political connotations. Much later, probably in the 3rd or 4th century, the word church came into use to denote the specific kind of assembly that the believers composed. The term church is also of Greek origin, from the word kuriakon, meaning “belonging to the lord.” It is now the most common term applied to groups of Christians as well as to the totality of the world's Christian membership. The word is also frequently applied to denominations, a usage now so common as to be unavoidable. Denominations are, however, institutional arrangements based on specific viewpoints and traditional practices. They exist as a result of long historical development, doctrinal diversity, and geographical separation.

During the first decades of the church's existence, there were four significant accomplishments: The assembly of believers separated themselves from the religion of Israel; they formulated an extensive assessment of what the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus meant; new congregations of believers were founded in all parts of the Roman Empire; and the believers improvised organizational arrangements and forms of worship that were to remain influential.

Separation from Israel.

The early Christians were all Jews. They remained in Jerusalem and partook of the religious observances in the Temple. They differed from their fellow Jews only in that they believed that the Messiah had come. Had they remained quiet about their conviction, they might well have remained a sect within Judaism. However, they insisted on preaching to all who would listen that the Jesus whom the Jewish authorities had persecuted was the one Israel had long awaited. This preaching aroused great hostility on the part of religious leaders, and the early Christians were persecuted.

Yet these Christians had no thought of venturing beyond the confines of Israel with their message. It was only with the appearance of a man named Saul of Tarsus that the assembly of believers enlarged its horizons to include the whole known world. Saul, a strict Jew, was a persecutor of the church. He was nevertheless converted, and, after changing his name to Paul, began what is called the mission to the gentiles. (The word gentile is simply a cover-all term for all non-Jewish peoples.) It was this man who, more than any other, pulled the church out from temple and synagogue and set it apart as a separate institution.

But the separation was, for Paul, more than a physical one. It was also doctrinal. Christians, he asserted, did not have to become Jews. They were not subject to all the rites, rituals, and laws of Israel's religion. This, perhaps more than any other factor, aroused the intense hostility of the Jews and led to a definitive separation of the two camps.

Assessment.

The books of the New Testament, particularly the writings of Paul, contain the early church's testimonies about who Jesus was and what his life meant. The first issue that had to be settled was whether Jesus was for Israel only. The answer, already noted, was no. That he was for Israel in some sense was undoubtedly true, because he is presented as the one who had fulfilled every prophecy and promise in Israel's scriptures (called by Christians the Old Testament). The first verse of the Book of Hebrews states: “When in former times God spoke to our forefathers, he spoke in fragmentary and varied fashion through the prophets. But in this, the final age, he has spoken to us in the Son whom he has made heir to the whole universe, and through whom he created all orders of existence.” In this verse, and in many other places, the New Testament makes clear that Jesus was the full and final revelation from God for all people.

This represented a whole new way of thinking about God. Somehow this Jesus was one with the creator. This notion is abhorrent to both Judaism and Islam, which are strictly monotheistic religions for whom God is one and cannot be divided. But the Christians had to deal with this problem, and from what they believed about Jesus they could come to no other conclusion. They claimed it to be true, even though they could not understand or explain it. They simply believed it and stated it in their early confession: Jesus is lord.

How could this man have achieved such status? The writers of the New Testament answer: by his death and resurrection. But how could these events, occurring as they did in a remote part of the Roman Empire, have a universal significance? Paul himself admitted that the notion was scandalous; it was offensive to Israel because the Jews could never conceive of their messiah being put to death; and it was likely to appear as plain nonsense to gentiles who had no knowledge of Israel's beliefs. Yet it was stated as true by all early Christians. They believed that Jesus, by his death, had paid a universal penalty for all human unbelief and disobedience toward God. They further asserted that the resurrection was the first act by which God was restoring the whole creation. Creation was, in the words of some modern Christians, being “born again,” being reconstituted and remade after God's original intention. This was the message the earliest Christians took, first to Israel, then to the rest of the world.

Mission to the gentiles.

Paul and his associates took this message to most of the urban centers of the Mediterranean world. By the end of the 1st century there were strong congregations in Alexandria, Ephesus, Antioch, Corinth, Thessalonica, and even at Rome, the capital of the empire. Jerusalem, the mother church, was dispersed when the Roman legions destroyed the city in AD 70 during a Jewish uprising.

Organization and worship.

It is unlikely that the early Christians intended to devise structures that would endure for centuries. But any institution, to operate successfully, must organize itself. Of first importance in the church were the apostles, those who had been with Jesus during his lifetime. To their number Paul was later added. They were the living and authoritative voices that could be appealed to on all questions of belief . To assist them, deacons, or attendants, were appointed to help in preaching and in the everyday operation of the congregations. Later, there developed other leaders called elders (in Greek, presbyteroi, from which the modern Presbyterian denomination gets its name) and leaders called episkopoi (literally meaning “overseers”—the word episcopal is derived from it—normally translated as bishops).

The early church had no clergy; it had people who performed specific functions—leading worship, preaching, collecting offerings, and feeding and clothing the poor among them. But as centuries passed, the three functions of bishop, elder (priest), and deacon became arranged in a hierarchy. The bishop became the overseer for a city or region. He was, as well, the authoritative person in matters of doctrine. In time these functionaries came to be set apart from the rest of the membership by a process called ordination—suggesting that they were a special order within the church. One of the problems that troubles modern denominations is the relation between these ordained offices and the regular members of the denomination, called the laity. Some denominations have attempted to erase the distinction, while others have held rather rigidly to the traditional forms.

In its worship life, Christianity borrowed greatly from Jewish forms. Christians used prayers, sang psalms, read from the scriptures (the Old Testament) and from some of Paul's letters, and listened to someone expound the scripture passages for the day. The day was Sunday, to commemorate the resurrection, which had taken place on the first day of the week.

In addition, Christians used two rites that had been commanded of them by Jesus himself. These rites, often called sacraments, or holy acts, were baptism and the Lord's Supper (or Eucharist, meaning “thanksgiving”). Baptism, an immersion in water to represent the washing away of sin, was the initiating rite by which one became a member of the church. The Lord's Supper was originally a community meal, followed by the receiving of bread and wine. This meal was a remembrance of Jesus' last meal with his disciples before he died. Today these rites are so variously defined by the many denominations that no single interpretation of them is possible.

God's Presence in the Church

Before Jesus left his disciples, he promised them that they would not be alone and helpless in the world. He said that after he was gone he would send them a helper, a teacher, a comforter to sustain them and aid in carrying out the church's mission. He called this helper the Holy Spirit. It would be the Holy Spirit's purpose to “guide them into all truth” and to bring to remembrance all that Jesus had said and done. The books of the New Testament are vivid in their conviction that this spirit was indeed living and working through the first Christians. They were spared neither pain, persecution, nor death; but they were convinced that God's spirit was sustaining them in all their endeavors.

The faith that the Holy Spirit was working among them again forced the early Christians to broaden their understanding of God. They concluded that he had revealed himself as the creator of all things, as Jesus the redeemer, and lastly as the spirit that sustained and preserved the church. To explain this impenetrable mystery, early Christian thinkers devised the doctrine of the Trinity. This doctrine was never an explanation of God. All it could do was set forth the firm belief that, for Christians, God was somehow at the same time one and three.

Life of Discipleship

Essentially Jesus commended to his followers the same type of life he led: selfless obedience to the will of God. He called himself a servant and said that they were to be servants as well. They were to fear nothing, not even death. He summed up what their basic attitude was to be by saying, “You shall love the Lord your God above all things and your neighbor as yourself.” They were to do good to all people and to carry the message concerning him everywhere. Above all, they were not to be just people who believed certain doctrines. Their obedience was to be an active participation in the life of the world.

Paul summed up the characteristics of the individual Christian by saying: “Put on the garments that suit God's chosen people . . . compassion, kindness, humility, gentleness, patience. Be forbearing with one another, and forgiving. The nature of the individual Christian's obedience and quality of life was generally left to private judgment within these parameters. Christians over the centuries have found a great variety of ways to express their individual faithfulness.

A Short History

The history of Christianity is filled with conflict, controversy, and division. It also has countless instances of brilliant creativity in worship, architecture, painting, sculpture, music, and literature. And in all ages churches have sought to carry out the mission entrusted to them by Jesus. Within this article only a very brief summary of the history can be given.

Early period to AD 380.

Christianity became established in nearly all parts of the Roman Empire and in the Middle East during the first two centuries. As it continued to grow and expand, it became the object of persecution by the Roman authorities. The severest persecutions came during the reigns of the emperors Domitian (AD 96), Marcus Aurelius (161–180), Decius (249–251), and Valerian (253–260). Worst of all was the attempt by the Emperor Diocletian (284–305) to extinguish Christianity altogether. But in 313 Constantine the Great issued an edict of toleration for all religions. In 380, Theodosius I made Christianity the official religion of the Roman Empire.

Middle Ages.

Although the church was empire-wide, two cities came to be more influential than others in guiding its affairs: Rome and Constantinople (now Istanbul). Many theological disputes arose in the centuries after Constantine, and these were usually settled by councils . The Roman church, headed by its bishop, the pope, gradually diverged in both belief and practice from the church at Constantinople, headed by its patriarch. The Roman church became dominant in Western Europe, while the church at Constantinople dominated the East. In 1054 the two churches broke off relations with each other.

Modern period.

Early in the 16th century a split occurred in the Roman church. Since that time the church in the West has been divided primarily between the Roman Catholic and Protestant segments. The term Protestantism has come to refer to nearly any denomination that is not affiliated with either the Roman Catholic or Eastern Orthodox branches. Among the older Protestant denominations are the Lutheran, Anglican, Presbyterian, Reformed, Methodist, and Baptist.

In the 20th century there have been attempts to revitalize and reunify the church. The World Council of Churches, founded in 1948, is an organization made up of most denominations except for the Roman Catholic. In the 1960s the Roman Church, in its Second Vatican Council, strove for spiritual renewal and modernization. Thus, after many centuries, most of the denominations that make up the worldwide church are in contact with one another. Many are involved in cooperative projects, and others have undertaken actual merger negotiations. The Roman and Orthodox churches resumed contact in 1965.

Additional references about Christianity
    Barrett, C.D. Understanding the Christian Faith (Prentice, 1980).
    Barth, Karl. The Word of God and the Word of Man (Peter Smith, 1958).
    Dawson, Christopher. Christianity in East and West (Sugden, 1981).
    Frend, W.H.C. The Rise of Christianity (Fortress, 1984).
    Gaustad, E.S. A Religious History of America (Harper, 1966).
    Johnson, Paul. A History of Christianity (Atheneum, 1976).
    Lewis, C.S. Mere Christianity (Macmillan, 1964).
    Marty, Martin. Christianity in the New World (Winston Press, 1984).

To cite this page:

  • MLA Style: "Christianity." Britannica Student Library. Encyclopædia Britannica 2009 Student and Home Edition. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica, 2009.
  • APA Style: Christianity. (2009). Britannica Student Library. Encyclopædia Britannica 2009 Student and Home Edition. Chicago: Encyclopædia Britannica.

Friday, 4 December 2009

Why did Jesus die?

Christians believe the death of Jesus was part of a divine plan to save humanity. But exactly how could this work?

Atonement and reconciliation

The events leading up to the arrest and crucifixion of Jesus are well-told by the Gospel writers, as are stories of the Resurrection. But why did Jesus die?


In the end the Roman authorities and the Jewish council wanted Jesus dead. He was a political and social trouble-maker. But what made the death of Jesus more significant than the countless other crucifixions carried out by the Romans and witnessed outside the city walls by the people of Jerusalem?

Christians believe that Jesus was far more than a political radical. For them the death of Jesus was part of a divine plan to save humanity.


The death and resurrection of this one man is at the very heart of the Christian faith. For Christians it is through Jesus's death that people's broken
relationship with God is restored. This is known as the Atonement.

What is the atonement?

The word atonement is used in Christian theology to describe what is achieved by the death of Jesus. William Tyndale introduced the word in 1526, when he was
working on his popular translation of the Bible, to translate the Latin word reconciliatio.

In the Revised Standard Version the word reconciliation replaces the word atonement. Atonement (at-one-ment) is the reconciliation of men and women to God throug
h the death of Jesus.

But why was reconciliation needed? Christian theology suggests that
although God's creation was perfect, the Devil tempted the first man Adam and sin was brought into the world. Everybody carries this original sin with them which separates them from God, just as Adam and Eve were separated from God when they were cast out of the Garden of Eden.

So it is a basic idea in Christian theology that God and mankind need to be reconciled. However, what is more hotly debated is how the death of Jesus achieved this reconciliation
.

There is no single doctrine of the atonement in the New Testament. In fact, perhaps
more surprisingly, there is no official Church definition either. But first, what does the New Testament have to say?

New Testament images

The New Testament uses a range of images to describe how God achieved reconciliation to the world through the death of Jesus. The most common is the image of sacrifice.


For example, John the Baptist describes Jesus as "the lamb of God that takes away the sins of the world". (John 1:29)

Here are some other images used to describe the atonement:

- a judge and prisoner in a law court
- a payment of ransom for a slave's freedom
- a king establishing his power
- a military victory

And here are some examples of how the New Testament explains the death of Jesus:


'For the Son of Man himself did not come to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many'. - Words attributed to Jesus in Mark 10:45


'Drink all of you from this', he said. 'For this is my blood, the blood of the covenant, which is to be poured out for many for the forgiveness of sins.' - Words attributed to Jesus in Matthew 26:28


Well then, in the first place, I taught you what I had been taught myself, namely that Christ died for our sins, in accordance with the scriptures... - Written by Paul in 1 Corinthians 15:3

How have later writers and theologians interpreted the Biblical accounts and theologies? In varied, and sometimes conflicting, ways.

Theories of the Atonement
Theories of the Atonement

Theologians have grouped together theories of the atonement into different types. For example, in Christus Victor (1931) Gustaf Aulén suggested three types: classical, Latin and subjective.

More recently in his book Christian Theology: An Introduction Ali
ster E. McGrath groups his discussion into four central themes but stresses that these themes are not mutually exclusive. His four themes are:
- The cross as sacrifice
- The cross as a victory

- The cross and forgiveness
- The cross as a moral example

The cross as sacrifice


The image of Jesus' death as a sacrifice is the most popular in the New Testament. The New Testament uses the Old Testament image of the Suffering Servant (Isaiah 53:5) and applies it to Christ.


The theme of Jesus's death as a sacrifice is most drawn out in the Letter to the Hebrews. The sacrifice of Christ is seen as the perfect sacrifice.


In the biblical tradition sacrifice was a common practice or ritual. In making an offering to God or a spirit, the person making the sacrifice hopes to make or mend a relationship with God.

St Augustine too wrote on the theme of sacrifice:



By his death, which is indeed the one and most true sacrifice offered for us, he purged, abolished and extinguished whatever guilt there was by which the principalities and powers lawfully detained us to pay the penalty. - Augustine - The City of God


He offered sacrifice for our sins. And where did he find that offering, the pure victim that he would offer? He offered himself, in that he could find no other. - Augustine - The City of God

The cross as a victory

The New Testament frequently describes Jesus's death and resurrection as a victory over evil and sin as reprsented by the Devil. How was the victory achieved?

For many writers the victory was achieved because Jesus was used as a ransom or a "bait". In Mark 10:45 Jesus describes himself as "a ransom for many". This word "ransom" w
as debated by later writers. The Greek writer Origen suggested Jesus's death was a ransom paid to the Devil.

Gregory the Great used the idea of a baited hook to explain how the Devil was tricked into giving up his hold over sinful humanity:

The bait tempts in order that the hook may wound. Our Lord therefore, when coming for the redemption of humanity, made a kind of hook of himself for the death of the devil. - Gregory the Great

Although the victory approach became less popular in the eighteenth century amongst Enlightenment thinkers - when the idea of a personal Devil and forces of evil was thrown into question - the idea was popularised again by Gustaf Aulén with the publication in 1931 of Christus Victor.

Aulén wrote of the idea Christus Victor:


Its central theme is the idea of the Atonement as a Divine conflict and victory; Christ - Christus Victor - fights against and triumphs over the evil powers of the world, the 'tyrants' under which mankind is in bondage and suffering, and in Him God reconciles the world to Himself. - Gustaf Aulén

The cross and forgiveness

Anselm of Canterbury writing in the eleventh century rejected the idea that God deceived the Devil through the cross of Christ. Instead he presented an alternative view which is o
ften called the satisfaction theory of the atonement.

In this theory Jesus pays the penalty for each individual's sin in order to right the relationship between God and humanity, a relationship damaged by sin.

Jesus's death is the penalty or "satisfaction" for sin.

Satisfaction was an idea used in the early church to describe the public actions - pilgrimage, charity - that a christian would undertake to show that he was grateful for forgiveness.

Only Jesus can make satisfaction because he is without sin. He is sinless because in the Incarnation God became man. The theory is thought out by Anselm in his work Cur Deus Homo or Why God became Man.

The cross as a moral example

Moral influence theories or exemplary theories comprise a fourth category used to explain the atonement. They emphasise God's love expressed through the life and death of Jesus.

Christ accepted a difficult and undeserved death. This demonstration of love in turn mo
ves us to repent and re-unites us with God. Peter Abelard (1079-1142) is associated with this theory. He wrote:


The Son of God took our nature, and in it took upon himself to teach us by both word and example even to the point of death, thus binding us to himself through love. - Peter Abelard

Abelard's theory and the call to the individual to respond to Christ's death with love continues to have popular appeal today.


...Our redemption through the suffering of Christ is that deeper love within us which not only frees us from slavery to sin, but also secures for us the true liberty of the children of God, in order that we might do all things out of love rather than out of fear - love for him that has shown us such grace that no greater can be found. - Peter Abelard

Penal substitution
Penal substitution

Did Jesus take the punishment for humanity's sins when he died on the cross?
That idea is called penal substitution and is summed up by Reverend Rod Thomas, from the evangelical group Reform, as "When God punished he showed his justice by punishing sin but he showed his love by taking that punishment himself".


© bbc.co.uk

Tuesday, 1 December 2009

Religions of the world : Christianity - The world's largest religion [ Original christianity and the following epochs ]

In the church history, the various epochs which followed the begin-fling of the Christendom are very well described by the historians. We shall therefore in this exposition deal only briefly with these eras. The time span could be arranged like this: firstly, the time of the church at its beginning up to the year 100 A.D., then the following space of the post-apostolic time with the developments right until the council ofNicaea 325 A.D., the establishing of the Roman state church, the space into the dark ages, the Reformation as a new beginning, the revival movements after, the introduction to the full gospel and the bringing back of the church into its original position before the return of Christ.

The church historical writings do not give an unanimous picture.
Many had some presumptions which they spoke about, others made legends of them and then there were of course those who thought they were facts. It is also obvious that a Catholic oriented writing is totally different from a protestant one. An overall picture about the different epochs and the developments therein is necessary to be able to compare things with the original at the very beginning. Only from the apostles have we received the apostolic doctrine. A brochure which was found in a convent in 1883 and was peradventure backdated to the years 80-120 A.D. carries the title “Doctrine of the twelve apostles” or “Didache”. It has certainly nothing to do or in common with the apostles of the Lord. So also the so-called apostolic creed which came into existence 300 years after the apostles and was formulated at various councils. This can certainly not be attributed to the apostles. In such a way, without intending it, the false things began to creep in. Only in the Book of Acts and in the epistles written by the apostles of the New Testament, we do have the true teaching. The apostles were men who had heard the Word directly from their Lord and by His commission gave unto us what they had received from Him. Through them, the New Testament church has received the pure, unfalsified Word of God which alone carries His seal. Paul was called in a supernatural way, chosen to be a special tool and
was placed with the original apostles of the Lord. He could say that to him a direct commission was given. Therefore, he could make the statement, “For Ihave received ofthe Lord which I also delivered unto you... “(I Cor. 11:23). He has written the majority of all the epistles, exactly 100 chapters with 2,325 verses where as Peter has written only 8 chapters with 166 verses. Paul had received the gospel in the same way as the prophets have received the Word by divine revelation (Gal. 1: 11-12). Therefore, he had to give the admonition which goes right through the bones, “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you let him be accursed” (Gal. 1: 8).
Whatever does not agree with the original gospel preached by the original apostles is under a curse. Ifwe look at it like this we are facing the fact that there exists a Christianity falsified and under a curse. This must have been the Christianity the critics were looking at when writing. The four evangelists give testimony of the Redeemer. They described His life, His ministry, and actually everything from His birth until His death, His resurrection and His ascension to heaven. The Synoptists
Matthew, Mark and Luke give a complementary report and an overall picture. John does not refer even to Bethlehemnor to the genealogies but he directly flies into the heights and shows in his very first verse in the first chapter who Christ really is. The four gospels record the accomplished salvation on the earth, God being in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself. These records are trustworthy because the reportswere given by true eye and ear witnesses as a testimony for all (II Pet.1: 16-18; I Jn. 1:1-3).
The Book of Acts introduces to us how the original church was supernaturally founded by the outpouring of the Holy Ghost (chapter 2). It was indeed an event that came right from heaven. In his first sermon, the Spirit filled apostle Peter spoke, by the commission of God, to those who would be converted and come to the faith. He spoke about the necessity of repentance and the Biblical water baptism (vs. 38) and also about the experience of receiving the baptism of the Holy Ghost as experienced by the hundred-and-twenty. He proclaimed, “For the prom ise is unto you, and to your children, and to all that are afar off even as many as the Lord, our God, shall call” (Acts 2: 39). God alone saves and adds to the church those who believe (Acts 2:47). The original church consisted of men and women who truly had an experience with God. Those who believed and were baptised in water were also in a supernatural way baptised with the Holy Ghost as members into the Body of Christ (I Cor. 12: 13) in which the spiritual gifts are in operation (I Cor. 12 + 14) and also the fruits of the Holy Spirit (Gal. 5: 22-23). As God was in Christ, His Body being the temple He dwelled in and did all He was pleased to do, so also the original church with the
redeemed was the body of the Lord (I Cor. 12: 12). He is the Head (Col. 1: 18). So He could continue His service through His church. He said, “As the Father hath sentme, even so send Iyou” (Jn. 20:21). Through the great commission, many things were to be taken care of. So He placed apostles, prophets, teachers, pastors and evangelists into the church (Eph. 4: 11).
In the original church, were not dignitaries but there were only men of God who were called by the highest calling and in dignity they served the Lord and His people under the leading and inspiration of the Holy Spirit. The original church did not know about the priests or any clergy taking an office, but the whole body of the redeemed, those who were born again, together formed the holy priesthood and the holy people of God (I Pet. 2: 9, Rev. 1: 6). As already mentioned, the fivefold ministry is meant for the church as a whole and is not restricted to a local assembly. The leaders or the elders of the sovereign local churches had their responsibilities. Those among them who took leadership were called bishops, and they had to be married (I Tim 3: 1-7; Tit. 1: 5-8). There was also a local church with more than one bishop, that is to say, with at least two leading elders in the local assembly (Phil. 1: 1). This agrees with James 5: 14 where it is written that if somebody gets sick he should call the elders of the church to pray for him. Paul and Barnabas were received in Jerusalemby the assembly, the apostles and the elders (Acts 15:4). In the original church, this divine order was in existence. To take care of practical things connected to a local church there were also deacons, and they had to be married as well (I Tim. 3: 8-18). It was necessary for the bishops and the deacons to be married to understand and to counsel in a practical way from their own experience, belonging to the local church and having family problems and so forth. The New Testament church did not know the office of a bishop as it is being practised in some churches today. According to I Tim 3: 15, the body of believers make up the House of God which is the Church of the living God, the pillar and ground of the truth. Both, the foundation and the pillar of the truth. Private interpretations and false things have no place therein, The true church is God’s habitation on earth and through it His will is being done as in heaven and so on earth. At the beginning since the foundation of the New Testament church, the pure proclamation of the true gospel, the true teachings and the apostolic practice was found in it. The original church was penetrated by
the Life of Jesus Christ and was led by the Holy Spirit as a living organism but not as an organised denomination. After some time, Paul and the other apostles had to deal with heresies and with deceivers. Pluralistic developments began and a number of
different directions started running parallel. But there was always one group ofbelievers that stayed with the true Word, the true gospel, the true doctrine and practice as originated with the apostles. The apostle John has also written about the different directions coming into existence at that time. He states, “We are of God. He that khoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. By this we know the spirit of truth and the spirit of error.” (I Jn. 4: 6). Already at that stage, there were various mixed Christian directions putting their own interpretations to theWord ofGod which later became doctrines. Such men the Holy Scriptures describe as false brethren who came in unaware without having a divine call to the ministry. Paul speaks very definitely concerning this subject. “And that because of false brethren unawares brought in, who came in secretly to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage” (Gal. 2: 4). These were men who preached another Jesus, who had received another spirit and who were preaching another gospel (II Cor. 11: 4). Peter warns the believers of false brethren who secretly introduced damnable doctrines (II Pet. 2: 1-3). The apostle Jude has also spoken about these Christian directions. “Woe unto them! For they have gone in the way of Cain and ran greedily after the error ofBalaamfor reward, and perished in the gainsaying of Korah” (vs. 11). The false brethren brought fourth falsifications and those who went astray pulled their group after them and as a result the various spiritual directions came into existence. As these groups deviated more and more, John saw the beginning of the antichrist movement. Anti means against, and therefore, everything that is against Christ and His Word must be called antichrist. He writes,
“They went out from us, but they were not of us;for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us; but they went out, that they might be manifest that they were not all of us” (I Jn. 2:19). The apostle Paul also gave a very clear warning when he made the statement, “For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock” (Acts 20:29). In Revelation 2, verse 2, the apostle John writes like this: “... and thou hast tried them who say they are apostles, and are not, and hastfound them liars. “How were they able to test without fail that these men who claimed to be apostles were not? They gave them the Word-test and checked if these men preached what Peter and Paul had already preached. The examination must always be done with the apostolic proclamation and practice. That is the only valid measuring rod. The question now arises:What is truth and what is falsification? It had already started in the early Christian age.
From the Bible passages already mentioned, it is obviously that parallel to the true church of Jesus Christ false directions began to establish themselves. Already before the turn of the first Christian century, there were different teachings and mixtures. One group believed in the doctrines of Balaam, the others held with the teachings of the Nicolaitanes, others listened to a woman named Jezebel who called herself a prophetess (Rev. 2:20) and so it went on and on, as it is confirmed in church history.
In order that we know which is right and which are the pure and true
doctrines of the apostles, they are clearly given to us in the Holy Scriptures. Also the various teachings which were brought in by unauthorised persons are mentioned therein. The challenge “Prove all things; holdfast that which is good” still holds good for today. Many have taken for granted that their practice and doctrine is right without proving and checking it. Others judge things from their own point of knowledge and doctrine as well as their own practice and have totally neglected to consider that the only valid measuring rod to prove all things is the entire testimony of God’s holy Word.
In the following century, all these groups developed along the side of the church of the living God which always believed what Christ and His apostles taught. Those movements which deviated from God’s Word gained more and more prominence. The narrow way was broadened and the gate was widened. Everyone of these movements had the aim to get as many members as possible just as it is among denominations of today.
To the true church of Jesus Christ, the same promise applies in all the ages, “Fear not, little flock, for it is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom” (Luke 12: 32). Those belonging to the little flock of the Lord will only listen to the voice of the good Shepherd Who gave His life for the sheep. They will hear only His Word. This is the ecclesia, the called out church at all times and the little flock which listens without compromise to the voice of the good Shepherd.
In the post apostolic times, Polycarp (t 155) who knew and was together with the apostle John, and Ireneus (t 202) who was a student of Polycarp are known to have fought for the true faith. Even so, if one examines thoroughly their teachings it becomes obvious that the pure and original doctrines and the beliefs of the apostles were not foundwith them in its entirety. The step down from the divine organism to a human organisation became evident in that age itself.
The developments until the council of Nicaea, 325 A.D., were very controversial. Apparently the majority of the so-called Christian religion established itself until the recognition of Constantine and then it became a very strong force in the whole of the Roman empire. The so-called Christian faith was made into a new philosophy. Oriental beliefs were mixedwith Hellenistic thoughts to destroy the original faith. At that time, the debates of the so-called Christology began and the tree of life was
exchanged for the tree of knowledge.

article from Traditional Christianity by E. Frank --> Read the book here




. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .


FOLLOW US

Follow us by:


::: Wild-Voice.Blogspot.com :::



Copyright © Wild-Voice 2019 .All rights reserved




Creative Commons License